Prosecutor, Are You Exhausted? "Hunting Down Rogue Prosecutors" Press Conference Series (II) — Response to the Taiwan High Prosecutors Office Prosecutor

Regarding Case 1 "Report to the Judge: Everything As Stated in the Attachment?" among the three cases released by our Foundation today (the 8th), the handling prosecutor from the Taiwan High Prosecutors Office immediately provided the written appeal for reference. Our Foundation respectfully responds as follows:

1. We declare at the outset that any criticisms raised by our Foundation regarding individual cases are entirely based on the full text of court judgments published by the Judicial Yuan.

2. We thank the handling prosecutor for promptly providing the written appeal they drafted, thereby assisting the public in clarifying the facts and the truth.

3. The written appeal submitted by the handling prosecutor is 6 pages long and explicitly points out at least 4 times that the original judgment "violated the rules of experience or logic" or "failed to apply rules or misapplied rules," while also "specifically indicating" the origins and sources of the questioned evidence.

4. As for why the Supreme Court criticized the prosecutor's written appeal for "failing to state in a single word how the original judgment violated laws and regulations," an explanation from the Supreme Court is awaited.

Media Contact

Attorney Lin Feng-cheng, Executive Director, Judicial Reform Foundation 02-25231178