Court Watch

Court Watch

Court watching is also part of judicial reform. Through court watching activities, monitoring judicial personnel helps enhance judicial transparency, identify systemic inadequacies, and prompt appropriate responses. Anyone of us can step into the court to make first-hand observation records and become a part of reform!
JRF / Court Watching

Step into the Court and Become
Part of Judicial Reform

Court watching is also part of judicial reform. By attending court sessions as observers to monitor judicial personnel, we can help enhance judicial transparency, identify systemic inadequacies, and prompt appropriate responses. Anyone of us can step into the court to record observations firsthand and jointly promote a more just judiciary!

Open
No Application Needed for Court Attendance
Monitor
Accountability for Judicial Personnel
Transparent
Enhancing Judicial Credibility
Everyone
Can Participate

1. What is Court Watching?

Court watching is a way for citizens to monitor the judiciary. Volunteers enter courts to observe hearings, record the words, actions, and conduct of judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys as well as the hearing proceedings, and report back on their observations. This transforms the judiciary from a forbidden zone exclusively for legal professionals into a public space that every citizen can personally participate in and monitor.

In Taiwan, most criminal and civil hearings are open to the public, and anyone can enter a court to observe hearings directly without prior application. JRF has long recruited observation volunteers to help pay attention to major miscarriage of justice cases or human rights-related cases, ensuring that no trial stands alone.

The Significance of Court Watching: Judicial fairness cannot rely solely on internal self-regulation; it also requires external monitoring. When the general public steps into courts to observe, the words and actions of judges and prosecutors are naturally kept in check; when observation logs are recorded and made public, systemic problems have the opportunity to be seen and changed.

2. The Value of Court Watching

Value 01

Holding Judicial Personnel Accountable

The mere presence of citizen observers creates a deterrent effect, prompting judges and prosecutors to handle every case and party with greater care.

Value 02

Demonstrating Judicial Transparency

Live records of court hearings allow the general public to understand the practical operations of the judiciary, breaking away its sense of mystery and enhancing public awareness of the judicial system.

Value 03

Safeguarding the Dignity of Parties

Facing the formidable apparatus of the state, the presence of citizens in the gallery makes defendants and their families feel supported by society, so they no longer feel isolated and helpless.

Value 04

Accumulating Grounds for Reform

Systematic observation records can serve as concrete material for advocacy and reform, elevating issues from individual cases to systemic discussions.

3. How to Participate in Court Watching

1

Follow JRF's Court Watching Recruitment Information

JRF regularly announces trial dates and locations for various cases on its official website and social media. Please keep an eye on "Court Watching Recruitment" events to confirm hearing dates, court locations, and important notes.

2

Sign Up or Go Directly to Observe

Some sessions require prior registration so that JRF can track attendance numbers, while public hearings welcome direct attendance. Please be sure to bring personal identification documents and comply with security regulations upon entering the court.

3

Observe Hearings and Pay Attention

Once inside the courtroom, please maintain courtroom order and keep quiet. You may bring paper and pens to record important hearing processes, but please note court regulations (audio and video recording are prohibited in court observation galleries).

4

Report Observations and Contribute to Reform

After the hearing, you can feed back your observation insights to JRF or submit articles sharing your observation experiences. Your records and feelings will become invaluable material for judicial reform.

Notes for Court Attendance: Before entering the court to observe, please first verify whether the case is open to the public (juvenile cases, sexual assault cases, etc., may be closed to the public). Eating and drinking are prohibited inside the courtroom; please set your mobile phones to silent to respect the proceedings. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact JRF.

4. Recent Court Watching Activities

For more articles on court watching, please see the Court Watching Section

Step into the Court Together and Make the Judiciary Less Mysterious

Court watching requires more citizen participation. If you agree with promoting judicial transparency through citizen monitoring, please pay attention to JRF's recruitment information or support our continued efforts through donations.

Last Edited Date: 2026-05-02

08Jul.
2026

Court Observation Recruitment | The Qiu Song-cheng Case: A Knife-Wielding Homicide Case Without a Knife | Investigation Hearing for the Fourth Remand of the Motion for Retrial

Judicial Reform Foundation

Ten years have passed since the court determined in 2015 that Qiu Song-cheng wielded a "pre-concealed fruit knife" and…

01Jul.
2026

Court Observation Recruitment | "Taiwan's Cambodia" State Compensation Case

Judicial Reform Foundation

29Apr.
2026

Court Observation Recruitment | State Compensation Case Regarding the "Taiwanese Version of Cambodia Scams"

Judicial Reform Foundation

In 2022, the Kaohsiung District Prosecutors Office established a special task force to investigate a transnational…

27Apr.
2026

Court Observation Recruitment | The Unfinished Su Case: Remand Proceedings (Second Remand)

Judicial Reform Foundation

Su Chien-ho, Liu Bing-lang, and Chuang Lin-hsun were charged with murder in 1991. After enduring 21 years of wrongful…

03Mar.
2026

Court Observation Recruitment | The Chiu Sung-ch'eng Case: A Murder Case with a Knife, Except There Was No Knife | Investigation Hearing for the Fourth Remanded Retrial Motion

Judicial Reform Foundation

Ten years have passed since the court concluded in 2015 that Chiu Sung-cheng held a "pre-concealed fruit knife" and…

21Jan.
2026

Court Observation Recruitment | The Qiu Songcheng Case: A Knife-Wielding Murder Case Without a Knife | Investigation Hearing on the Fourth Remanded Motion for Retrial

Judicial Reform Foundation

It has been 10 years since the court concluded in 2015 that Qiu Songcheng had wielded a "pre-concealed fruit knife" and…

31Oct.
2025

Court Observation Recruitment | The Chiu Sung-Cheng Case: A Knife-Wielding Murder Case Without a Knife | Investigation Hearing for the Fourth Remand and Retrial of the Motion for Retrial

Judicial Reform Foundation

On October 31 at 10:00 AM, the fifth retrial investigation hearing for Sung-Cheng Chiu will take place in the 4th…

02Aug.
2025

Op-Ed | What Era Is This That Note-Taking in the Gallery Is Still Prohibited?

Huang Hsu-t'ien / Chairperson, Judicial Reform Foundation

Article 86 of the Court Organization Act stipulates that court arguments and the pronouncement of judgments shall be…

25Jun.
2025

Court Observation Recruitment | "Taiwanese Cambodia-style" State Compensation Case | Third Preparatory Hearing

Judicial Reform Foundation

In recent years, Taiwan was rocked by the nationwide "Taiwanese Cambodia-style" scam, in which Taiwanese citizens…

12May.
2025

Court Observation Recruitment | Retrial Investigation Hearing for the Hsiao Ming-yueh Case

Judicial Reform Foundation

13 years have passed, and the Taiwan High Court Taichung Branch is scheduled to hold the retrial investigation hearing…

08May.
2025

Court Observation Notes | The Criminal Retrial of the Hsueh Ching-piao Case

Yang Ya-chu / Department of Law, National Chung Cheng University

Hsueh Ching-piao was previously sentenced to 16 years of imprisonment for violating the Narcotics Hazard Prevention…

08May.
2025

Court Observation Insights: A Law Student’s First Court Observation

Hsieh Yun-Yun / Department of Law, National Chung Cheng University

This was my first time attending a court hearing after starting law school. With nearly three years of legal studies…