We earnestly implore the Yuan to track and confirm that the National Police Agency undertakes the following actions:

1. Use this case as a teaching case study, incorporating it into the training on competencies and sensitivity for frontline police officers handling sexual assault-related cases.
2. Particularly within the standard operating procedures for dispatch center call-takers, incorporate alerts for child-related cases and stipulate that "if frontline dispatch personnel are unable to distinguish between sexual harassment and sexual molestation, all cases shall be transferred directly to the Women and Children Protection Squad for handling."
3. Review the current standard operating procedures for one-stop services, requiring that even if it is inconvenient to conduct injury examinations and statement reduction at the hospital, horizontal networking communication during the police reporting stage (police investigation, health injury examination, social welfare accompanying interrogation) must still be integrated through the police (Women and Children Protection Squad) to reduce unclear information and the waste of administrative processes.

We earnestly implore the Yuan to track and confirm that the Ministry of Health and Welfare clearly establishes a "Green Channel Mechanism" within the standard operating procedures for one-stop services in sexual assault cases:

When a report is received at the reporting end, it should immediately "contact the hospital in advance and have the hospital prepare beforehand" to optimize injury examination and evidence collection procedures (including reducing unnecessary waiting times, notifying required documents in advance, and reducing repetitive statements).

We earnestly implore the Yuan to urge the Ministry of Health and Welfare to undertake the following actions:

1. The MOHW domestic violence prevention system should establish horizontal communication with schools and crime victim protection units to jointly produce a comprehensive and complete rights notification form for victims (including what schools can do, crime victim protection compensation, and legal litigation resources). Drawing on the practice during police interviews where victims are required to sign and confirm to indicate they have been clearly informed of relevant rights, this form should be provided directly to victims by social workers accompanying them during police interviews, which can effectively reduce gaps and lower social workers' workloads.
2. Using this case as an example, hold relevant internal seminars and educational training to ensure that in cases similar to this one, social work personnel possess the professional competence to serve child sexual assault victims, including learning the language and techniques for interacting with children and the ability to build professional rapport in a short time, in order to truly maximize the effectiveness of social worker accompaniment.

We earnestly implore the Yuan to urge the New Taipei City Department of Education to undertake the following actions:

1. The New Taipei Education Department should cooperate with police systems and social welfare unit resources (whether education leads or police leads is open for discussion, but the education department must understand the importance of expanding investigations and actively facilitate and assist), obtain rosters of past students from the classroom where the incident occurred, or conduct visits from schools near the incident location to investigate students who may have participated in that classroom, in order to contact and care for potentially victimized students. Following the aforementioned investigations, the network should cooperate with social welfare units to intervene and provide medical and psychological assistance.
2. The New Taipei Education Department should produce clear guidelines for counseling victimized children. Dedicated guidance counselors or school personnel actually have little experience and training in handling trauma from child sexual violence. Secondary traumatization of victimized children occasionally occurs during the counseling process. Therefore, there is an urgent need for relevant concrete guidelines to teach counseling personnel appropriate expression and responses when facing cases, guiding victims to recount the events without harming them.

Furthermore, we earnestly implore the Yuan to urge the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and the Ministry of Education to review shortcomings in current communication mechanisms and establish and improve them:

1. When there are multiple suspected victims or the circumstances are serious, local county and city education departments should report to the secretary-general or deputy secretary-general of the county or city government to establish a cross-departmental task force for handling. When necessary, they should secure rosters of children contacted by the perpetrator and expand notifications to parents.
2. Due to the lengthy timelines of judicial investigation and trial processes, through communication mechanisms, while a case has entered investigation but has not yet been indicted, or after indictment but before a final judgment is rendered, the perpetrator may still violate the Protection of Children and Youths Welfare and Rights Act or the Gender Equity Education Act. Notice should be given to the respective competent authorities to raise awareness among educational administrative units and avoid inappropriate administrative arrangements.

We earnestly implore the Yuan to:

1. Investigate, issue corrections on, and conduct administrative supervision over OO Elementary School and its personnel for their shortcomings in accordance with the law.
2. Regarding shortcomings in the current student counseling system, earnestly implore the Yuan to urge the Ministry of Education to establish a professional supervisory system for student counseling, provide clear guidelines for counseling sexual violence incidents, and establish tiered handling methods.

We therefore earnestly implore the Yuan to investigate and urge the Ministry of Justice to:

1. To avoid communication deficits like those in this case, it is recommended to add a note to Item 4 of the Crime Victim Rights Notification Form: "If you wish to be accompanied to court by a trusted person, please submit a request to the prosecutor (or prosecutor investigator) prior to the court session to facilitate prior arrangement. The prosecutor (or prosecutor investigator) will inform you of the arrangement before the session. If you have not yet received a notice, please contact the prosecutor (or prosecutor investigator) to confirm prior to the session."
2. Why was the litigation agent in this case also refused accompaniment into the courtroom? What was the reason? Why did the handling prosecutor, while failing to explain how their presence would obstruct investigative proceedings, find it necessary to exclude lawyer-accompanied interrogation? Does this reflect improper application of standard operating procedures for child sexual assault cases by individual prosecutors? This should be investigated and clarified.
3. Ensure that standard operating procedures for child sexual assault cases across local prosecutors offices incorporate prior arrangement and communication mechanisms for accompanying personnel, as well as thorough notification procedures, to protect victims' psychological support and stability during the investigation process, and provide appropriate courtroom spatial configurations for prosecutors to arrange according to different case needs.

We therefore earnestly implore the Yuan to urge the Judicial Yuan to undertake the following actions:

1. Investigate the standard operating procedures for personal data redaction work in the Civil Execution Division, especially how special warnings are issued and regulations established for sensitive cases involving child sexual exploitation or related matters.
2. The court clerk in this case committed not only an administrative lapse but also displayed an unprofessional attitude in problem-solving, which warrants official disciplinary supervision.

We earnestly implore the Yuan to urge the Crime Victim Protection Association to undertake the following actions:

1. Comprehensively review the standard operating procedures for sending and receiving mail across all branches of the Association for Victims Support, particularly regarding the dispatch of confidential and sensitive data, to prevent errors from recurring.
2. Regarding situations where New Taipei DVSAPC, Legal Aid Foundation (LAF), and Association for Victims Support "clearly fail to meet LAF case-referral standards, yet still demand applicants go to LAF first," submit a comprehensive review at liaison meetings pursuant to Article 18 of the Crime Victim Rights Protection Act, audit whether similar situations occur across tripartite networks nationwide, and align counties and cities experiencing this with the practices of those without such issues to avoid wasting administrative resources.
3. Regarding the evaluation of internal lawyer assistance within the Association for Victims Support, reference the experience of the Legal Aid Foundation and strive for the Judicial Yuan and Ministry of Justice to establish an internal information-sharing platform.
4. It is recommended that the Association for Victims Support and county and city domestic violence and sexual assault prevention centers integrate resources to design a complete victim rights notification form. This form should inform victims of counseling and complete litigation assistance resources—including the respective review standards and assistance items of the domestic violence and sexual assault prevention center, the Legal Aid Foundation, and crime victim protection—and social workers from the domestic violence and sexual assault prevention center should provide it directly to victims at the very beginning when accompanying them to investigations. This will not only achieve administrative reduction but also allow victims to obtain resources and assistance more swiftly.