Court Watch
Court watching is also part of judicial reform. Through court watching activities, monitoring judicial personnel helps enhance judicial transparency, identify systemic inadequacies, and prompt appropriate responses. Anyone of us can step into the court to make first-hand observation records and become a part of reform!
1. What is Court Watching?
Court watching is a way for citizens to monitor the judiciary. Volunteers enter courts to observe hearings, record the words, actions, and conduct of judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys as well as the hearing proceedings, and report back on their observations. This transforms the judiciary from a forbidden zone exclusively for legal professionals into a public space that every citizen can personally participate in and monitor.
In Taiwan, most criminal and civil hearings are open to the public, and anyone can enter a court to observe hearings directly without prior application. JRF has long recruited observation volunteers to help pay attention to major miscarriage of justice cases or human rights-related cases, ensuring that no trial stands alone.
The Significance of Court Watching: Judicial fairness cannot rely solely on internal self-regulation; it also requires external monitoring. When the general public steps into courts to observe, the words and actions of judges and prosecutors are naturally kept in check; when observation logs are recorded and made public, systemic problems have the opportunity to be seen and changed.
2. The Value of Court Watching
Value 01
Holding Judicial Personnel Accountable
The mere presence of citizen observers creates a deterrent effect, prompting judges and prosecutors to handle every case and party with greater care.
Value 02
Demonstrating Judicial Transparency
Live records of court hearings allow the general public to understand the practical operations of the judiciary, breaking away its sense of mystery and enhancing public awareness of the judicial system.
Value 03
Safeguarding the Dignity of Parties
Facing the formidable apparatus of the state, the presence of citizens in the gallery makes defendants and their families feel supported by society, so they no longer feel isolated and helpless.
Value 04
Accumulating Grounds for Reform
Systematic observation records can serve as concrete material for advocacy and reform, elevating issues from individual cases to systemic discussions.
3. How to Participate in Court Watching
1
Follow JRF's Court Watching Recruitment Information
JRF regularly announces trial dates and locations for various cases on its official website and social media. Please keep an eye on "Court Watching Recruitment" events to confirm hearing dates, court locations, and important notes.
2
Sign Up or Go Directly to Observe
Some sessions require prior registration so that JRF can track attendance numbers, while public hearings welcome direct attendance. Please be sure to bring personal identification documents and comply with security regulations upon entering the court.
3
Observe Hearings and Pay Attention
Once inside the courtroom, please maintain courtroom order and keep quiet. You may bring paper and pens to record important hearing processes, but please note court regulations (audio and video recording are prohibited in court observation galleries).
4
Report Observations and Contribute to Reform
After the hearing, you can feed back your observation insights to JRF or submit articles sharing your observation experiences. Your records and feelings will become invaluable material for judicial reform.
Notes for Court Attendance: Before entering the court to observe, please first verify whether the case is open to the public (juvenile cases, sexual assault cases, etc., may be closed to the public). Eating and drinking are prohibited inside the courtroom; please set your mobile phones to silent to respect the proceedings. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact JRF.
4. Recent Court Watching Activities
2026-04-29 Event
2026-03-03 Event
2025-06-25 Event
2025-05-12 Event
For more articles on court watching, please see the Court Watching Section
Related Resources and Further Reading
- Apply for Mock Trials — Bringing Legal Education into Campuses
- Apply for Lecture Collaboration — Invite JRF to Speak to Your Community
- Citizen Participation in Trials Section — Citizen Judge System Reforms
- Criminal Procedure Reform Section
- Criminal Miscarriages of Justice Relief Section
- Judicial Yuan Official Website (External Link, Opens in a New Window)
Step into the Court Together and Make the Judiciary Less Mysterious
Court watching requires more citizen participation. If you agree with promoting judicial transparency through citizen monitoring, please pay attention to JRF's recruitment information or support our continued efforts through donations.
Last Edited Date: 2026-05-02
18Sep.
2023
2023
Court Observation｜The Unfinished Su Case: The Sixth Civil Preparatory Proceeding
On September 18, the High Court's Civil Division will hold the sixth preparatory proceeding following the remand of…
07Nov.
2022
2022
Court Observation | The Unfinished Su Case: The Fifth Civil Preparatory Proceeding
On November 7, the Taiwan High Court Civil Division will hold the fifth preparatory proceeding for this case after it…
19Oct.
2022
2022
Court Observation | Announcement of the JRF Court Observation on Judge Chao Po-hsiung
23Sep.
2022
2022
Court Observation Recruitment | Third Criminal Retrial in the Case of Former National Handball Athlete Ch'en Ching-k'ai
The fourth pre-retrial investigative hearing for this case will be held on Friday, September 23. Regarding the…
09Jun.
2022
2022
Court Observation | Shih Mu-chin Case: Disciplinary Court Disciplinary Appeals Chamber, 111年度懲上字第2號 Preparatory Proceedings
In late December 2021, the first-instance court ruled that most of the facts exceeded the 10-year disciplinary statute…
01Jun.
2020
2020
Public Hearing on the Disciplinary Case against Prosecutor Ch'en Lung-hsiang in the Disciplinary Court of the Judicial Yuan – Court Observation of the Disciplinary Case against Prosecutor Ch'en Lung-hsiang (Part III)
The disciplinary case against Prosecutor Ch'en Lung-hsiang, which has sparked disputes between the powers of监察 (監察權)…
18Mar.
2020
2020
Public Hearing of the Disciplinary Case against Prosecutor by the Disciplinary Court of the Judicial Yuan: Court Observation on the Disciplinary Case against Prosecutor Ch'en Lung-hsiang (Part 2)
This disciplinary case, which has sent shockwaves through the legal community, will hold its second public hearing. We…
14Feb.
2020
2020
Public Trial for Prosecutor Disciplinary Case at the Disciplinary Court of the Judicial Yuan – Court Observation of Prosecutor Ch'en Lung-hsiang's Disciplinary Case
Is this disciplinary case, which sent shockwaves through the legal community, an unconstitutional intervention of the…
15Jan.
2015
2015
Supreme Court Oral Argument Research Group — Call for Applications
In December 2012, the Supreme Court announced that it would henceforth hold oral arguments for death penalty sentencing…