1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform

Monitoring the Judiciary · Historical Review

1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform

In July 1999, Taiwan held its first-ever government-led National Conference on Judicial Reform with extensive grassroots participation. Spanning three days, the conference reached 32 conclusions, marking a major milestone in bottom-up judicial reform. This page compiles related articles and evaluation reports from before and after the conference for public reference.

32
Conference Conclusions
3
Days of Sessions
1999
Held in July
25+
Related Articles
BACKGROUND

Conference Background

Prior to 1999, public grievances against the judiciary ran deep, and public calls for reform were surging.

Long-Accumulated Grassroots Momentum for Judicial Reform

Since its establishment in 1995, the Judicial Reform Foundation has consistently tracked individual cases, advocated for legislation, and broadly mobilized public attention on judicial reform. By the late 1990s, public dissatisfaction with a stagnant and sluggish judiciary had reached its limit, prompting an unprecedented number of legal professionals to take to the streets and demand prompt reform.

Convening of the National Conference on Judicial Reform

Facing this surging grassroots momentum for reform, then-President Li Teng-hui (李登輝) responded to the public will by committing to institutional judicial reform. In July 1999, the National Conference on Judicial Reform was officially convened. Over the course of three days, representatives from judicial practice, academia, and civil society gathered to reach 32 concrete conclusions, followed by specific implementation measures and timelines proposed by the Judicial Yuan.

Historical Significance and Subsequent Challenges

This conference was an unprecedented event in Taiwan's judicial reform history, yielding fruitful outcomes. However, a review report three years later showed that the government's overall implementation score reached only 40.6; a review a decade later bluntly remarked, "A decade of judicial reform is like a dream; before waking, one is already worn thin." This history serves as both the starting point of reform and a testament to persistent grassroots pressure.

PRE-CONFERENCE · 1997

Pre-Conference Phase: Civil Society Advocacy and Preparation

In 1997, civil society groups actively advocated for the convening of the National Conference on Judicial Reform and voiced expectations and oversight regarding the preparatory process.

Commentary
We Look Forward to a Judicial Reform Decision-Making Conference That Reflects the Voice of the People
Read Full Article
Press Release
Civil Judicial Reform Groups Issue a Statement Regarding the Preparatory Committee of the National Conference on Judicial Reform
Read Full Article
VOICES · 1999

"Mobilizing the Public to Reform the Judiciary" Voice Series

In conjunction with the 1999 Judicial Reform Conference, the Judicial Reform Foundation invited figures from all walks of life to write articles on judicial issues, presenting diverse voices for reform.

Commentary
Grasping the Core Themes of "Human Rights" and "the Public"—Three Expectations for the National Conference on Judicial Reform
Read Full Article
Commentary
Women and the Judiciary—"Mobilizing the Public to Reform the Judiciary" Voice Series
Read Full Article
Commentary
The Necessity of Establishing Labor Courts in Taiwan from the Perspective of Labor Disputes—"Mobilizing the Public to Reform the Judiciary" Voice Series
Read Full Article
Commentary
Regardless of Ideology, We Want Fairness and Justice—Please Promptly Establish a Legal Aid System
Read Full Article
Commentary
Can Cases Be Solved Without Torture?
Read Full Article
Commentary
Justice Is Not Fake; Court Attendance Must Be Earnest—"Mobilizing the Public to Reform the Judiciary" Voice Series
Read Full Article
Commentary
Examining the Issue of Secondary Victimization in Sexual Assault Cases within the Judiciary—"Mobilizing the Public to Reform the Judiciary" Voice Series
Read Full Article
Commentary
What If He Were Wu Tse-yuan!—"Mobilizing the Public to Reform the Judiciary" Voice Series
Read Full Article
Commentary
The Struggle of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities in Judicial Dilemmas—"Mobilizing the Public to Reform the Judiciary" Voice Series
Read Full Article
Commentary
Drinking Culture and Judicial Reform—"Mobilizing the Public to Reform the Judiciary" Voice Series
Read Full Article
Commentary
Seeking a Judge Bao or a Judge?—"Mobilizing the Public to Reform the Judiciary" Voice Series
Read Full Article
Commentary
What Is Mandatory Defense During Investigation
Read Full Article
CONCLUSION · 1999

Conference Conclusions and Agenda Records

The 1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform reached a total of 32 conclusions, which were subsequently compiled and published by the Judicial Yuan in an agenda and conclusion handbook.

1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform Agendas and Conclusions

Compiled and published by the Judicial Yuan, this volume comprehensively compiles all discussion agendas and the 32 conclusions reached at the National Conference on Judicial Reform held in July 1999. It serves as essential primary literature for studying the history of Taiwan's judicial reform.

Author: Compiled by the Judicial Yuan | Publication Date: 2016-03-15

REVIEW & ASSESSMENT

Subsequent Review and Performance Assessment

Following the conference, the Judicial Reform Foundation continuously tracked the government's implementation progress and issued evaluation reports on its third and tenth anniversaries.

Press Release
How Can the Sluggish Judicial Reform Train Carry the Public's Earnest Expectations?! Third-Anniversary Evaluation Report and Judicial Public Opinion Poll Results of the National Judicial Reform Conference

The third-anniversary evaluation report showed that the government's overall implementation score reached an average of only 40.6 out of 100. Group 1 ("Judicial Administration and Civil Litigation") scored 43.8, Group 2 ("Criminal Procedure System") scored 36.4, and Group 3 ("Personnel Reform for Judges and Prosecutors") scored 40. The report noted that execution progress on core issues concerning the success or failure of judicial reform showed no significant improvement compared to the previous year.

Read Evaluation Report
External Link
A Decade of Judicial Reform Is Like a Dream; Before Waking, One Is Already Worn Thin—10-Year Review of the National Conference on Judicial Reform

A decade later, the Judicial Reform Foundation reviewed the 1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform as the cover story of Issue 72 of Judicial Reform Magazine. It invited conference participants to share their firsthand perspectives, reviewing the successes, failures, and unfulfilled aspects of the decade of reform from the differing angles of academia and civil reformers.

Read (Digital Archives System)
FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS · 2006–2009

Follow-Up Actions: Ongoing Oversight and Advocacy

Following the 1999 conference, the Judicial Reform Foundation continued to monitor the progress of judicial reform and spoke out at critical moments.

Press Release
The Monster Is Back Again? Our Foundation's Statement on the Draft Act for the Establishment of the Judicial System Reform Review Committee
Read Full Article
Event
Public Q&A Session Held by Legal Professional Groups for the Presidential Candidates of Both Parties
Read Full Article
Press Release
Legal Professional Groups Hold Public Q&A Session; Frank Hsieh Attends
Read Full Article
Press Release
Joint Statement on Publicly Questioning the Presidential Candidates of Both Parties on Judicial Professional Issues
Read Full Article
Press Release
Judicial Reform with Expectations Amid Disappointment—Civil Groups Visit President Ma Ying-jeou to Offer Judicial Reform Proposals
Read Full Article

Reform Has Never Stopped

The 1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform was a major milestone for civil society in promoting judicial reform. In 2017, the National Customs on Judicial Reform once again mobilized civil society strength. The Judicial Reform Foundation continues to track and oversee developments to ensure that reform commitments do not remain empty talk.

2017 Judicial Reform Resolutions: Oversight and Implementation 2016 National Judicial Reform Movement
Last Edited: 2026-04-28 | Source: Judicial Reform Foundation Official Website and Digital Archives System