1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform
1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform
In July 1999, Taiwan held its first-ever government-led National Conference on Judicial Reform with extensive grassroots participation. Spanning three days, the conference reached 32 conclusions, marking a major milestone in bottom-up judicial reform. This page compiles related articles and evaluation reports from before and after the conference for public reference.
Conference Background
Prior to 1999, public grievances against the judiciary ran deep, and public calls for reform were surging.
Since its establishment in 1995, the Judicial Reform Foundation has consistently tracked individual cases, advocated for legislation, and broadly mobilized public attention on judicial reform. By the late 1990s, public dissatisfaction with a stagnant and sluggish judiciary had reached its limit, prompting an unprecedented number of legal professionals to take to the streets and demand prompt reform.
Facing this surging grassroots momentum for reform, then-President Li Teng-hui (李登輝) responded to the public will by committing to institutional judicial reform. In July 1999, the National Conference on Judicial Reform was officially convened. Over the course of three days, representatives from judicial practice, academia, and civil society gathered to reach 32 concrete conclusions, followed by specific implementation measures and timelines proposed by the Judicial Yuan.
This conference was an unprecedented event in Taiwan's judicial reform history, yielding fruitful outcomes. However, a review report three years later showed that the government's overall implementation score reached only 40.6; a review a decade later bluntly remarked, "A decade of judicial reform is like a dream; before waking, one is already worn thin." This history serves as both the starting point of reform and a testament to persistent grassroots pressure.
Pre-Conference Phase: Civil Society Advocacy and Preparation
In 1997, civil society groups actively advocated for the convening of the National Conference on Judicial Reform and voiced expectations and oversight regarding the preparatory process.
"Mobilizing the Public to Reform the Judiciary" Voice Series
In conjunction with the 1999 Judicial Reform Conference, the Judicial Reform Foundation invited figures from all walks of life to write articles on judicial issues, presenting diverse voices for reform.
Conference Conclusions and Agenda Records
The 1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform reached a total of 32 conclusions, which were subsequently compiled and published by the Judicial Yuan in an agenda and conclusion handbook.
1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform Agendas and Conclusions
Compiled and published by the Judicial Yuan, this volume comprehensively compiles all discussion agendas and the 32 conclusions reached at the National Conference on Judicial Reform held in July 1999. It serves as essential primary literature for studying the history of Taiwan's judicial reform.
Author: Compiled by the Judicial Yuan | Publication Date: 2016-03-15
Subsequent Review and Performance Assessment
Following the conference, the Judicial Reform Foundation continuously tracked the government's implementation progress and issued evaluation reports on its third and tenth anniversaries.
The third-anniversary evaluation report showed that the government's overall implementation score reached an average of only 40.6 out of 100. Group 1 ("Judicial Administration and Civil Litigation") scored 43.8, Group 2 ("Criminal Procedure System") scored 36.4, and Group 3 ("Personnel Reform for Judges and Prosecutors") scored 40. The report noted that execution progress on core issues concerning the success or failure of judicial reform showed no significant improvement compared to the previous year.
Read Evaluation ReportA decade later, the Judicial Reform Foundation reviewed the 1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform as the cover story of Issue 72 of Judicial Reform Magazine. It invited conference participants to share their firsthand perspectives, reviewing the successes, failures, and unfulfilled aspects of the decade of reform from the differing angles of academia and civil reformers.
Read (Digital Archives System)Follow-Up Actions: Ongoing Oversight and Advocacy
Following the 1999 conference, the Judicial Reform Foundation continued to monitor the progress of judicial reform and spoke out at critical moments.
Reform Has Never Stopped
The 1999 National Conference on Judicial Reform was a major milestone for civil society in promoting judicial reform. In 2017, the National Customs on Judicial Reform once again mobilized civil society strength. The Judicial Reform Foundation continues to track and oversee developments to ensure that reform commitments do not remain empty talk.
2017 Judicial Reform Resolutions: Oversight and Implementation 2016 National Judicial Reform Movement
2009
Hope Amidst Disappointment: Civil Society Groups Visit President Ma Ying-jeou to Present Proposals for Judicial Reform
Civil society organizations officially visited President Ma Ying-jeou at the Presidential Office this morning (December…

2008
Joint Statement on Publicly Questioning the Presidential Candidates of Both Major Parties on Professional Judicial Issues
We, four organizations, previously held a press conference on January 30, 2008, publicly announcing that we would pose…

2008
Public Q&A Session Held by Legal Professional Associations, Attended by Hsieh Chang-ting
The public Q&A session for the presidential candidates of both major parties, jointly organized by four legal…

2008
Public Q&A Session with Major-Party Presidential Candidates Hosted by Legal Professional Organizations
The Taiwan Bar Association, Judicial Reform Foundation, Taipei Bar Association, and Taiwan Law Society jointly decided…

2006
Here Comes Another Monster? Statement of JRF on the Draft Act for the Establishment of the Judicial System Reform Review Committee
Today (October 17), the Procedure Committee of the Legislative Yuan passed a motion to submit the "Draft Organic Act…
2002
How Can the Sluggish Judicial Reform Train Bear the Public's Earnest Expectations?! Three-Year General Checkup Report on the National Judicial Reform Conference and Judicial Public Opinion Survey Results
Three years have passed since the National Judicial Reform Conference was held in 1999. This unprecedented event in…

1997
Statement by Civil Judicial Reform Groups Regarding the Preparation Committee for the National Judicial Reform Conference
The Judicial Yuan announced the composition of the preparation committee: three attorneys, three judges, three…