Legislative Recommendations

JRF / Policy Research and Advocacy / Drafts & Legal Opinions

Legislative Recommendations
Civil Society Drafts, Drafting Suggestions, and Legal Opinions on Bills

Since its founding in 1995, the Judicial Reform Foundation has drafted civil-society versions of bills, proposed amendment language, and issued legal opinions on legislation concerning the judiciary, in order to build a system that better protects human rights and due process. This page brings together the legislative issues the JRF follows, organized by area, including criminal, civil, and administrative litigation; court organization; judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and police; and the protection of rights, so that you can quickly find what you need.

5
Areas of Reform
27
Legislative Issues
3
Types of Materials
1995
Advocating Since

This page features three types of materials:

Civil Society Drafts Drafting Suggestions Legal Opinions

Click an issue below to visit its dedicated page and browse the materials the JRF has produced in that area over the years, including press releases, statements, draft amendments, commentaries, public hearing testimony, and special newsletter features.

I

Criminal, Civil, and Administrative Litigation

Procedural and Substantive Law Reform

Reforms to litigation procedure and substantive law that most directly affect ordinary people, including citizen participation in trials, criminal and civil procedure, drug policy, administrative litigation, and forensic science and expert testimony.

II

Court Organization

Court Structure and Organization

Organizational issues concerning how courts operate and how cases are assigned and adjudicated, including the highest judicial bodies, the Constitutional Court, audio and video recordings of court proceedings, court interpreting, and reducing the workload of judges and prosecutors.

III

Judges, Prosecutors, Defense Attorneys, and Police

Systems for Legal Professionals

Legislative research and amendment proposals on systemic issues concerning judges, prosecutors, attorneys, and police officers, including their training, evaluation, removal, and rights.

IV

Protection of Rights

Safeguarding Individual Rights

Legislative issues concerning the protection of individual rights, including criminal immunity for helping professionals, the digital rule of law, crime victims' rights, mental health, criminal compensation, state compensation, legal aid, and habeas corpus.

V

Comprehensive Policy Blueprint

Cross-Disciplinary Reform Planning

Comprehensive judicial reform planning that goes beyond individual bills and spans multiple fields, reflecting the JRF's vision for the overall direction of judicial reform.

Support the JRF's Legislative Advocacy

Legislative research and advocacy require long-term commitment. Your donation helps us keep pushing for a judicial system that better protects human rights.

Support Judicial Reform → View the Judicial Reform Blueprint
Last updated: May 7, 2026
27Dec.
2022

The Judicial Reform Foundation's Comments on the Amendments to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act

Judicial Reform Foundation

Regarding the draft amendments to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act proposed by the Judicial Yuan, the Judicial…

26Dec.
2022

Taiwan Judicial Reform Foundation's Comments on the Amendment to the Enforcement Rules of the Constitutional Court and Lay Assessor Act

Taiwan Judicial Reform Foundation

To observe and continually revise the implementation of the Enforcement Rules of the Lay Assessor Act, these comments…

26Dec.
2022

Comparison Table of CSOs' Proposed Provisions for the Crime Victim Rights Protection Act

Judicial Reform Foundation

The ten key amendment points released in the civil-society draft by the Crime Victim Protection Association on…

22Jul.
2022

Proposals for Amendment | Comments on the Amendment to Article 273 of the Administrative Litigation Act Regarding Retrial Provisions

Judicial Reform Foundation

We hereby provide our comments on the amendment to Article 273 of the Administrative Litigation Act regarding retrial…

27Feb.
2022

Statement of Opinion on the Ministry of Justice's 2021 Draft Amendments to the Money Laundering Control Act

Judicial Reform Foundation

Since 2014, the Judicial Reform Foundation has monitored what are commonly known in judicial practice as…

17Jul.
2020

Statement of Opinions on the Draft Amendment to the Regulations on the Implementation of Prosecutor Evaluation

Taiwan Association for Judicial Reform

In accordance with Official Letter Fa-Chien-Tzu No. 10904515870 issued by the Ministry of Justice on June 22, 2020,…

17Jul.
2020

Statement of Comments on the Draft Amendment to the Regulations Governing the Organization of the Prosecutor Evaluation Commission

Judicial Reform Foundation

Pursuant to the Ministry of Justice Official Letter No. Fa-Chian-Tzu-10904521330 dated June 17, 2020, the comments on…

13Apr.
2020

Comments on the Amendment to the Enforcement Rules of the Judges Act

Judicial Reform Foundation

Pursuant to the Judicial Yuan's Official Document Yuan-Tai-Ting-Szu-I-Tzu No. 1090008607 dated March 31, 2020, our…

13Apr.
2020

Comments on the Amendment to the Regulations for the Implementation of Evaluations by the Judges Evaluation Committee

Judicial Reform Foundation

In accordance with the Judicial Yuan's Official Document Yuan-Tai-Ting-Szu-I-Zi No. 1090006804 dated March 27, 2020,…

31Oct.
2019

Q&A on Paragraph 2, Article 19 of the Whistleblower Protection Act

Judicial Reform Foundation

On October 30, the Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee of the Legislative Yuan held cross-party caucus…

14May.
2019

Q&A on the Controversy Surrounding the NGO Draft Amendments to the Judges Act

Judicial Reform Foundation

Recently, the NGO draft amendments to the evaluation chapter of the Judges Act proposed by our foundation have drawn…

15May.
2018

JRF's Comments on the Judicial Yuan's Draft "Lay Participation in Criminal Trials Act"

Judicial Reform Foundation

The Judicial Reform Foundation's comments regarding various provisions in the Judicial Yuan's Draft "Lay Participation…