2017 Judicial Reform Resolutions: Oversight & Implementation

Monitoring and Implementation・2017 National Customs/Judicial Reform Conference

Monitoring the Implementation of Resolutions from the 2017 National Judicial Reform Conference

In November 2016, President Tsai Ing-wen personally convened the Office of the President National Judicial Reform Conference, bringing together representatives from the judiciary, prosecution, and defense, as well as cross-disciplinary civil society actors. Following nearly a year of intensive discussions, a comprehensive set of judicial reform resolutions was adopted in August 2017. JRF continues to track the implementation of these resolutions to ensure that reform commitments do not remain empty promises.

2016
Preparations Announced
→
2017.02
Subcommittee Meetings Begin
→
2017.08
Concluding Meeting Resolutions
→
Present
Ongoing Implementation Monitoring
BACKGROUND

Origins of the National Judicial Reform Conference

In 2016, public expectations for judicial reform reached a peak. Making "judicial reform" a major political platform, President Tsai Ing-wen promptly announced the convening of the Office of the President National Judicial Reform Conference upon taking office. She personally served as the convener, delegating representatives from various sectors to formulate reform proposals addressing core issues in the existing judicial system through subcommittee meetings.

The conference was divided into five working groups covering five major dimensions: victim protection, judicial quality, authority and responsibility systems, public participation, and social safety. A total of over 40 subcommittee and additional meetings were held, culminating in the concluding meeting on August 12, 2017, where reform resolutions were formally adopted.

Key directions of the concluding meeting resolutions include:

Establishing the citizen judge system, introducing public participation in prosecutorial screening, strengthening assistance measures for vulnerable groups, promoting open courtroom audio and video, enhancing transparency of attorney information, digitizing judicial hardware equipment, reforming the prosecutorial personnel system, building a pyramid-shaped adversarial trial procedure (mandatory defense and attorney representation), promoting restorative justice, and enhancing continuing education and training for judges, among others.

KEY OUTCOMES

Eight Key Areas of Reform

01 Citizen Judge SystemEnabling ordinary citizens to participate in the trial of major criminal cases to enhance the democratic legitimacy of the judiciary
02 Public Participation in Prosecutorial ScreeningEstablishing a mechanism for the public to monitor prosecutors' decisions not to prosecute
03 Pyramid-Shaped Trial ProcedureMandatory defense and attorney representation to improve trial quality and reduce the burden on final appellate courts
04 Open Courtroom Audio and VideoPutting indictments in major cases online and institutionalizing the application process for courtroom audio and video recordings
05 Reform of Judge EvaluationStrengthening the independence and functions of the Judge and Prosecutor Evaluation Commissions
06 Transformation of Drug PolicyShifting from a penalty-oriented approach to a health-centered diversified treatment model
07 Protection for Vulnerable GroupsStrengthening interpretation resources, judicial protections for indigenous peoples, and juvenile correctional reform
08 Penitentiary System ReformParole transparency, improvement of prison medical care, and justification of inmate treatment
FIVE GROUPS

Materials from the Five Subcommittee Meetings

Click on each subcommittee to access complete meeting recordings, official materials, and JRF commentary:

Subcommittee I
Protection of Crime Victims and Vulnerable Groups
Crime victim protection, miscarriage of justice relief, judicial situations of vulnerable groups, forensic science appraisal, as well as non-disclosure of investigations and media influence on trials. Total of 10 meetings.
View Subcommittee Materials
Subcommittee II
A Trusted, Impartial, and Professional Judiciary
Grand Justices' interpretation procedures, allocation of judicial policy-making powers, court organization and procedural reform, establishment of specialized courts, and judicial neutrality. Total of 8 meetings.
View Subcommittee Materials
Subcommittee III
A Judiciary with Balanced Authority and Responsibility, and High Efficiency
Transparency and efficiency of the prosecution system, appointment and supervision of judges and prosecutors, professional ethics of attorneys, and professional division of labor among police, prosecutors, and investigators. Total of 7 meetings.
View Subcommittee Materials
Subcommittee IV
A Participatory, Transparent, and Accessible Judiciary
Legal education and bar examinations, public participation in the judiciary (lay assessor / jury systems), judicial openness and transparency, and making judicial documents accessible. Total of 7 meetings.
View Subcommittee Materials
Subcommittee V
A Judiciary Safeguarding Social Security
Prison administration reform, criminal policies on drugs and mental illness, effective combating of crime, crime prevention, and juvenile- and gender-friendly justice. Total of 8 meetings.
View Subcommittee Materials
Official Resources
Office of the President Official Website & Outcome Reports
Official website of the Office of the President National Judicial Reform Conference, including all subcommittee pages, meeting materials, and transcripts.
Visit Official Website
MONITORING RECORDS

Resolution Implementation Tracking Records

JRF continuously records the progress of resolution implementation, evaluates reform outcomes annually, and reports publicly to society:

OFFICIAL RESOURCES

Official Materials and Original Documents

Office of the President National Judicial Reform Conference

Official website, including five subcommittee pages, all meeting materials, and proceedings records.

justice.president.gov.tw

Subcommittee Meeting Records Overview

All subcommittees on the official website, where meeting agendas, member lists, and complete meeting materials can be viewed.

View Subcommittee Pages

Judicial Reform Conference YouTube Channel

Complete playlists of all subcommittee meeting recordings, viewable by subcommittee and session.

Go to YouTube Channel

Judicial Reform Cannot Stop, Monitoring Must Continue

The adoption of resolutions is merely the starting point; true reform requires continuous attention and pressure from civil society. Support JRF's work to keep the voice of monitoring effective.

Last Edited Date: 2026-04-27
28Mar.
2017

Speech Word Count Statistics for Division 2 of the National Chio-Kuo Conference on Judicial Reform

Judicial Reform Foundation

Based on the official verbatim transcripts of the meeting, this analysis calculates the word count of each committee…

27Mar.
2017

Brief Notes: Third Meeting of Group 3 of the Presidential Office's Judicial Reform National Consultation Conference

Liao Ch'ang-chün / Graduate Institute of Law, National Chengchi University & JRF Intern

Article 5 of the current Judges Act already provides for the diversified recruitment of scholars and attorneys, but…

27Mar.
2017

Medical Records Provided by Imprisonment—Medical Care for Inmates

Interviewed by Huang Lin-Yuan (Standing Supervisor, Taiwan Grassroots Nurses Union); Compiled by Hu Pei-Yung (Department of Political Science, National Chengchi University); Revised by Lin Wei-Ting (Project Researcher, Judicial Reform Foundation)

We know too little about inmates, yet judge them too soon. A person enters prison only after committing a crime and…

27Mar.
2017

Taiwan's Recidivism Rates and Prison Rehabilitation Efficacy: A Preliminary Inquiry

Chung Hung-pin / Doctoral student, Faculty of Law, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany

Changes in the rates of recidivism and habitual offending among prison inmates can be attributed to various potential…

25Mar.
2017

Judicial Review of Court Decisions, Here It Comes!

Wang Ting-yü (Adjunct Lecturer and Ph.D. Student, Department of Law, Soochow University)

Recently, the National Congress on Judicial Reform has been in full swing. Beyond becoming a primary battleground for…

24Mar.
2017

Review and Notes: The Third Meeting of the Second Division of the Presidential Office's National Judicial Reform Conference

Ho Yu-lun / Legal Policy Researcher, Judicial Reform Foundation

The third meeting of Division 2 of the National Judicial Reform Conference was held on March 20 to primarily discuss…

24Mar.
2017

Review: The Second Meeting of the Fifth Division of the "Presidential Office's National Judicial Reform Conference"

Eileen / Volunteer

Prison administration reform cannot be separated from "education"; only with successful education can reform be…

23Mar.
2017

Observations on the Individual Evaluation System under the Judges Act: A Report for the National司改 Conference

Judicial Reform Foundation

On June 14, 2011, the Legislative Yuan passed the Judges Act on its third reading. The institutionalization of the…

22Mar.
2017

Unity of Prosecutors, Circling the Wagons in Self-Defense?!

Chiang Jung-hsiang (Practicing Attorney, Executive Committee Member of the Judicial Reform Foundation)

"Unity of prosecutors" refers to the internal administrative hierarchy within the prosecutorial system, where superiors…

21Mar.
2017

Word Count Statistics for Speeches in Group 3 of the National Youth Conference on Judicial Reform

Taiwan Association for Judicial Reform

Based on the official meeting transcripts released, this analysis calculates the word count of each member's speeches.…

17Mar.
2017

Op-Ed | Budget-Friendly Judicial Reform: Follow Germany's Lead!

Yu Po-hsiang (Standing Executive Committee Member, Judicial Reform Foundation; Attorney-at-Law)

The widespread phenomenon of "frivolous lawsuits" not only frustrates defendants but also overburdens prosecutors,…

16Mar.
2017

Brief Notes: Second Meeting of the First Working Group of the Presidential Office's National Judicial Reform Conference

Taiwan Association for Judicial Reform

This meeting lasted for three and a half hours, focusing on the discussion of "whether to establish a national-level…